Talk:European Filing Rules
From XBRLWiki
(Difference between revisions)
| Revision as of 11:02, 5 October 2012 (edit) Hommes (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 11:03, 5 October 2012 (edit) Hommes (Talk | contribs) (→Comments) Next diff → |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == Comments == | == Comments == | ||
| - | Comment-01 | + | === Comment-01 === |
| RH: Can we use only 'instance' as the term for a report, XBRL document, filing document etc.? | RH: Can we use only 'instance' as the term for a report, XBRL document, filing document etc.? | ||
| - | Comment-02 | + | === Comment-02 === |
| RH: This 'rule' states that there is no rule for instance naming. I suggest to alter the rule to: Any taxonomy author MUST prescribe instance file naming conventions. We can make a couple of suggestions on how other projects have created such rules. | RH: This 'rule' states that there is no rule for instance naming. I suggest to alter the rule to: Any taxonomy author MUST prescribe instance file naming conventions. We can make a couple of suggestions on how other projects have created such rules. | ||
Revision as of 11:03, 5 October 2012
Comments
Comment-01
RH: Can we use only 'instance' as the term for a report, XBRL document, filing document etc.?
Comment-02
RH: This 'rule' states that there is no rule for instance naming. I suggest to alter the rule to: Any taxonomy author MUST prescribe instance file naming conventions. We can make a couple of suggestions on how other projects have created such rules.
