Talk:European Filing Rules
From XBRLWiki
(Difference between revisions)
| Revision as of 08:43, 11 October 2012 (edit) Katrin (Talk | contribs) (→Comment-03) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 08:52, 11 October 2012 (edit) Katrin (Talk | contribs) (→Comments) Next diff → |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| RH: This 'rule' states that there is no rule for instance naming. I suggest to alter the rule to: Any taxonomy author MUST prescribe instance file naming conventions. We can make a couple of suggestions on how other projects have created such rules.<br> | RH: This 'rule' states that there is no rule for instance naming. I suggest to alter the rule to: Any taxonomy author MUST prescribe instance file naming conventions. We can make a couple of suggestions on how other projects have created such rules.<br> | ||
| KH: There need not be any file name conventions. So I would suggest to use CAN instead of MUST. | KH: There need not be any file name conventions. So I would suggest to use CAN instead of MUST. | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Comment-03 === | ||
| + | KH: Rule should be reformulated. | ||
Revision as of 08:52, 11 October 2012
Contents |
Comments
Comment-01
RH: Can we use only 'instance' as the term for a report, XBRL document, filing document etc.?
KH: I agree. I'm going to change it to instance document.
Comment-02
RH: This 'rule' states that there is no rule for instance naming. I suggest to alter the rule to: Any taxonomy author MUST prescribe instance file naming conventions. We can make a couple of suggestions on how other projects have created such rules.
KH: There need not be any file name conventions. So I would suggest to use CAN instead of MUST.
Comment-03
KH: Rule should be reformulated.
